|
|
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 1 | 17 | 18 | 19 | | 20 | 21 1 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 1 | 26 | | 27 | 28 1 | 29 | 30 | 31 1 | | |
|
|---|
| Public Works Committee Meeting on Monday May 28th 2012Posted: May 17th 2012 Please note, there will be a Public Works Committee Meeting on Monday May 28th, 2012, at 8:30 am at... Planning and Development Services Committee Meeting on June 5th 2012Posted: May 17th 2012 Please note, there will be a Planning & Development Services Committee Meeting on Tuesday June... Committee of the Whole Meeting on June 5th 2012Posted: May 17th 2012 Please note, there will be a COTW Meeting on Tuesday June 5th, 2012, immediately following the 5:30... Planning and Development Services Committee Meeting on Tuesday June 19th 2012Posted: May 17th 2012 Please note, there will be a Planning & Development Services Committee Meeting on Tuesday June... Regular Council Meeting on Tuesday June 19th 2012Posted: May 17th 2012 Please note, there will be a Regular Council Meeting on Tuesday June 19th, 2012, immediately... |
| 2004 Performance MeasurementsTownship of Laurentian Valley - Year 2003 Performance Measurements
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
|
Operating Costs
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 18.10% of total Municipal Operating Costs. |
Costs of governance and corporate management as a percentage of total Municipal operating costs. |
Efficient Municipal administration. |
|
FIRE SERVICES
|
Operating Costs
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $0.26 per $1,000.00 assessment. |
Operating costs for fire services per $1,000.00 of assessment. |
Efficient Municipal fire services. |
The municipality is protected by a volunteer fire department. |
POLICE SERVICES
|
Operating Costs
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $239.28 per household. |
Operating costs for police services per household. |
Efficient Municipal police services. |
The municipality is protected by the Ontario Provincial Police. |
|
Crime Rate - Violent
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 3.56 violent crimes per 1,000 persons. |
Violent crime rate per 1,000 persons. |
Safe communities. |
none |
|
Crime Rate - Property
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 23.45 property crimes per 1,000 persons. |
Property crime rate per 1,000 persons. |
Safe communities. |
none |
|
Crime Rate - Other Criminal Code Violations (excluding traffic)
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 15.75 other criminal code, excluding traffic, crimes per 1,000 persons. |
Other criminal code, excluding traffic, crime rate per 1,000 persons. |
Safe communities. |
none |
|
Crime Rate - Youth
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 14.31 of youths charged per 1,000 youths. |
youths charged per 1,000 youths. |
Safe communities. |
|
ROAD SERVICES
|
Operating Costs-Paved Roads
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $959.12 per paved lane kilometer. |
Operating costs for paved roads per lane kilometer. |
Efficient Maintenance of paved roads. |
lane is 1/2 of a two lane road. |
|
Unpaved Roads
|
|
|
|
| $1,239.39 per unpaved lane kilometer. |
Operating costs for unpaved roads per lane kilometer. |
Efficient Maintenance of unpaved roads. |
some seasonal gravel roads are considered single lane |
|
Winter Control
|
|
|
|
| $806.22 per lane kilometer. |
Operating costs for winter control maintenance per lane kilometer. |
Efficient winter control. |
|
|
Conditions of Roads
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
|
|
| 49.3% per lane kilometer. |
Percentage of paved lane kilometers where conditions are rated good to very good. |
Provide a paved lane system that has a pavement condition that meets Municipal standards. |
Laurentian Valley does not rate roads through testing, they are rated by age and condition |
|
Winter Event Responses
|
|
|
|
| 100 % of winter event responses. |
Percentage of winter event responses that met or exceeded Municipal standards. |
Provide appropriate winter response. |
None |
WASTE WATER
|
Operating Costs for Collection
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $1,391.76 per kilometer of main. |
Operating costs for collection wastewater per kilometer of main |
Efficient wastewater collection services. |
|
Operating Costs for Treatment and Disposal
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $300.66 per megaliter. |
Operating costs for treatment and disposal of wastewater |
Efficient wastewater treatment and disposal service. |
megaliter = 1,000 cubic meters. |
|
Operating Costs for Collection, Treatment and Disposal
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $364.09 per megaliter. |
Operating costs for collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater |
Efficient wastewater services. |
megaliter = 1,000 cubic meters. |
|
Main Backups
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
|
|
| 4 per 100 kilometers of main. |
Number of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometers of wastewater main in a year. |
Prevention of human and environmental health hazards. |
There were four backups in 2004. |
|
Bypasses Treatment
|
Effectevness Measure
|
|
Notes
|
| N/A % of wastewater is estimated to have bypassed treatment. |
Wastewater estimated to have bypassed treatment. |
Municipal sewage management practices prevent environmental and human health hazards. |
City of Pembroke is responsible for treatment of sewage. |
WATER SERVICES
|
Operating Costs for Treatment
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $627.95 per megaliter. |
Operating costs for the treatment of drinking water. |
Efficient production of drinking water. |
megaliter = 1,000 cubic meters. |
|
Operating Costs for Distribution
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $2,578.74 per kilometer of water distribution pipe. |
Operating costs for the distribution of drinking water. |
Efficient distribution of drinking water. |
megaliter = 1,000 cubic meters. |
|
Operating Costs for Treatment and Distribution of drinking water
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $821.34 per megaliter. |
Operating costs for the treatment and distribution of drinking water. |
Efficient production and distribution of water. |
megaliter = 1,000 cubic meters. |
|
Watermain Breaks
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
|
|
| 0 per 100 kilometers of main. |
Number of breaks in water main per 100 kilometers of water main pipe in a year. |
Improve system reliability and minimize water loss and operational costs. |
There were no breaks in 2004. |
|
Boil Water Advisories
|
|
|
|
| 0 days in 2004. |
Weighted number of days when a boil water advisory issued by the Medical Officer of Health was in effect. |
Water is safe and meets local needs. |
There were no advisories in 2004. |
SOLID WASTE
|
Operating Costs for Garbage Collection
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $131.11 per household. |
Operating costs for garbage collection. |
Efficient municipal garbage collection services. |
|
|
Operating Costs for Garbage Disposal
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $32.94 per household. |
Operating costs of garbage disposal. |
Efficient municipal garbage disposal services. |
|
|
Operating Costs for Integrated Systems
|
Efficiency Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| $164.48 per household. |
Average operating costs for solid waste management per household. |
Efficient solid waste management. |
|
|
Facility Compliance
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
|
|
| 0 days. |
Number of days per year when a M.O.E. compliance for remediation concerning air or groundwater is in effect. |
Municipal solid waste services do not have an adverse effect on the environment. |
|
|
# of Solid Waste Management Sites
|
|
|
|
| 1 site. |
Total number of solid waste management sites owned by Municipality. |
Effective management of solid waste. |
|
|
Complaints for Solid Waste & Recycling Collection
|
|
|
|
| 6.3747 complaints per 1,000 households. |
Number of complaints received in a year per 1,000 households. |
Effective waste management. |
None |
|
Diversion of Solid Waste
|
|
|
|
| 52.50% of residential waste was diverted. |
Percentage of solid waste diverted. |
Municipal waste programs divert garbage from landfills. |
Improvement due to introduction of new system. |
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
|
Growth and Settlement Patterns
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 23.50% of new development. |
Percentage of new development with final approval which is located within settlement areas. |
New lot creation is occuring in settlement areas. |
|
|
Preservation of Agricultural Lands
|
|
|
|
| 100% of agricultural land. |
Percentage of land designated agriculture, which was preserved during 2004. |
Preserve agricultural land. |
|
|
Change in Designated hectares
|
Effectiveness Measure
|
Objective
|
Notes
|
| 0.0% of agricultural land. |
Number of hectares of land originally designated agricultural which was redesignated in 2004. |
Preserve agricultural land. |
|
|
Preservation of Agricultural Lands
|
|
|
|
| 100.00% of agricultural land. |
Percentage of land designated agriculture preserved since 2000. |
Preserve agricultural land. |
2000 is the base year. |
|
Changes in Number of Designated hectares in reporting year
|
|
|
|
| 0.00% of agricultural land. |
Number of hectares of land originally designated for agricultural purposes which were re-designated for other uses since January 1, 2000. |
Preserve agricultural land. |
2000 is the base year. |
Also in Departments->Finance |